ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Exploration of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Management, and Clinical Implications.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Decision-Making and Imaging-Guided Follow-Up Strategies in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence is accumulating that shows spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) as a recognized cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), disproportionately affecting younger people and women. Moreover, despite continuing progress, the understanding of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of SCAD remains limited. SCAD, by definition, is a non-atherosclerotic formation of an intramural hematoma or intimal tear, yet current diagnostic criteria and management are derived from atherosclerotic ACS guidelines. This review encompasses the current understanding of the condition, including risk factors, diagnostic and imaging modalities available for detection, differentials to be considered, associations with other comorbidities, prognostic factors, and management options for both the short and long term, encompassing both medical and interventional therapies. Meanwhile, a lack of research in key populations, such as non-pregnant women, postmenopausal women, and men, prevents the generalizability of these findings and has been highlighted. However, by identifying and conceptualizing existing evidence, this review aims to provide direction to future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.