Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41524058›Full record

ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025

Exploration of Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Management, and Clinical Implications.

Aro Daniela Arockiam, Praveen Bharath Saravanan, Priyansha Singh, Aonghus J Feeney, Ankit Agrawal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aro Daniela ArockiamInternal Medicine, Unity Health-White County Medical Center, Searcy, AR 72143, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9691-7258
Praveen Bharath SaravananInternal Medicine, KAP Viswanatham Government Medical College, TN 620001 Tiruchirappalli, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8058-096X
Priyansha SinghInternal Medicine, Smt. Nathiba Hargovandas Lakhmichand Municipal Medical College, GJ 380006 Ahmedabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3864-427X
Aonghus J FeeneySchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, H91 TK33 Galway, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5178-7814
Ankit AgrawalCardiovascular Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7885-6667

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence is accumulating that shows spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) as a recognized cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), disproportionately affecting younger people and women. Moreover, despite continuing progress, the understanding of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of SCAD remains limited. SCAD, by definition, is a non-atherosclerotic formation of an intramural hematoma or intimal tear, yet current diagnostic criteria and management are derived from atherosclerotic ACS guidelines. This review encompasses the current understanding of the condition, including risk factors, diagnostic and imaging modalities available for detection, differentials to be considered, associations with other comorbidities, prognostic factors, and management options for both the short and long term, encompassing both medical and interventional therapies. Meanwhile, a lack of research in key populations, such as non-pregnant women, postmenopausal women, and men, prevents the generalizability of these findings and has been highlighted. However, by identifying and conceptualizing existing evidence, this review aims to provide direction to future research.

Indexed as

atherosclerosiscoronary artery diseasespontaneous coronary artery dissection

Identifiers

PMID41524058
PMCPMC12780996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.