ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2025
Utility of Cardiac Rehabilitation Following Surgical Treatment of Infective Endocarditis.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infective endocarditis (IE) is a life-threatening cardiac infection. The incidence of IE is increasing due to complex sociodemographic shifts, including increases in intravenous drug use (IVDU) attributed to opioid epidemics. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a comprehensive form of secondary prevention for heart disease. Current guidelines suggest that CR may be beneficial in the recovery from IE, but supporting evidence is limited. Given the utility of CR in the recovery from other cardiac conditions and the unique characteristics of patients with IE, this narrative review summarizes the existing data on the use of CR following surgical treatment of IE. The existing literature is limited to the CopenHeart
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.