ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2026
Total score of the computer vision syndrome questionnaire predicts refractive errors and binocular vision anomalies.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate the efficacy of the total computer vision syndrome questionnaire (CVS-Q) score as a predictive tool for identifying individuals with symptomatic binocular vision anomalies and refractive errors.
methodsA total of 141 healthy computer users underwent comprehensive clinical visual function assessments, including evaluations of refractive errors, accommodation (amplitude of accommodation, positive relative accommodation, negative relative accommodation, accommodative accuracy, and accommodative facility), and vergence (phoria, positive and negative fusional vergence, near point of convergence, and vergence facility). Total CVS-Q scores were recorded to explore potential associations between symptom scores and the aforementioned clinical visual function parameters.
resultsThe cohort included 54 males (38.3%) with a mean age of 23.9±0.58y and 87 age-matched females (61.7%) with a mean age of 23.9±0.53y. The multiple regression model was statistically significant [
conclusionThe total CVS-Q score is a valid and reliable tool for predicting the presence of various non-strabismic binocular vision anomalies and refractive errors in symptomatic computer users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.