ArticleAlpha psychiatry2025
Evaluation of the Characteristics Associated With Methamphetamine Use in Patients With Heroin Use Disorder.
Article in Alpha psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study compared addiction severity, psychotic symptoms, suicide risk, and craving in patients with heroin use disorder, with and without methamphetamine use. We also investigated the reasons for methamphetamine use in these patients, and assessed 3-month clinical follow-up and treatment compliance. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 166 inpatients diagnosed with heroin use disorder (DSM-5). Patients were divided into two groups: heroin use only (H), and heroin use + methamphetamine use (H+M). Clinical assessments included the Addiction Profile Index-Clinical Form (API-C), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), and Suicide Probability Scale (SPS). Statistical analyses were conducted with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) and included descriptive statistics, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, and logistic regression. Three-month follow-up results and treatment compliance were compared between the two groups. Results: The H and H+M groups included 80 and 86 participants, respectively. The H+M group had higher BPRS total scores, API-C subscale scores (craving, risky behaviors, excitement-seeking, impulsiveness, depression), addiction severity, additional substance use, anxiety, depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation, and 3-month lapse rate. Craving and excitement-seeking were independent predictors of methamphetamine use. Conclusion: The H+M group showed more severe addiction, novelty-seeking personal characteristics, and suicidal ideation compared to the H group. Craving scores were higher in the H+M group and should not be overlooked, along with a greater risk of early lapse. Our study found that craving, risky behaviors, depressive and psychotic symptoms, and suicidal thoughts are the most critical issues to be addressed in the treatment and follow-up of the H+M patient group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.