Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41523961›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in nursing : JRN2026

Content validation and testing of a gamified web tool for nursing supervision.

Raquel Silva, Rafael Camelo, Cristina Pinto, Maria Joana Campos, Marta Campos Ferreira, Carla Sílvia Fernandes

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in nursing : JRN, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Raquel SilvaAlto Ave Local Health Unit, EPE, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1390-5786
Rafael CameloFaculty of Engineering of the University of Porto, Portugal.
Cristina PintoPorto Higher School of Nursing, Porto, Portugal.
Maria Joana CamposPorto Higher School of Nursing, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8894-3633
Marta Campos FerreiraINESC TEC - Institute of Systems and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9505-5730
Carla Sílvia FernandesSchool of Health - Polytechnic Institute of Viana do Castelo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7251-5829

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to validate the content of a game focused on clinical supervision in nursing, with the collaboration of experts, and to assess its usability alongside a group of nurses. The development of SUPERVISE Methods: A mixed study design was used. In the first phase, the content of the game was validated with the participation of experts using a modified e-Delphi method. In the second phase, the usability of SUPERVISE Results: In the first phase, the content of the game was validated by 36 experts, reaching a consensus Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of combining rigorous content validation with practical evaluation to develop effective gamified educational tools for nursing practice.

Indexed as

clinical supervisioneducational technologygamificationnursing educationnursing students

Identifiers

PMID41523961
PMCPMC12788993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.