ArticleCirculation reports2026
Elevated B-Type Natriuretic Peptide as a Predictor of Unfavorable Outcomes in Post-Acute Stroke Patients.
Article in Circulation reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a key biomarker for heart failure (HF) and widely used for risk stratification. Elevated BNP levels in acute stroke are linked to poor outcomes, but its prognostic value in the post-acute phase remains unclear. Methods and Results: This retrospective study included 876 patients admitted to a rehabilitation hospital after acute cerebral infarction or hemorrhage between February 2019 and December 2022. Patients were classified into 4 groups based on BNP or N-terminal prohormone of BNP. The primary outcome was all-cause unfavorable events, including in-hospital death or transfer due to worsening condition. The severely elevated BNP group had a significantly higher risk of all-cause unfavorable events (hazard ratio: 2.34; 95% confidence interval: 1.26-4.32) than the normal group. No significant difference was observed in the mildly or moderately elevated BNP groups. BNP showed superior predictive value over HF diagnosis in terms of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.712 vs. 0.691), net reclassification improvement (0.304, P=0.002), and integrated discrimination improvement (0.025, P=0.015). Higher BNP was associated with lower body mass index, reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate, longer time from stroke onset, atrial fibrillation, and cardioembolic stroke. Conclusions: BNP levels in the post-acute stroke phase were significantly associated with unfavorable outcomes and may serve as a useful prognostic marker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.