ArticleCirculation reports2026
Pulse Rate Variability and All-Cause Mortality Risk in the General Japanese Population.
Article in Circulation reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although pulse rate variability (PRV) is considered a potential surrogate marker for heart rate variability in the assessment of autonomic function, it is not clear whether PRV-derived parameters predict mortality risk in the general population. Methods and Results: Between 2009 and 2018, a total of 5,943 Japanese individuals, aged 30-79 years, were recruited for a prospective study and followed until the end of 2022. The pulse wave was examined over a 5-min period using a fingertip photoplethysmography sensor to determine the resting heart rate (RHR) and the time and frequency domains of PRV. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of PRV-derived parameters for all-cause mortality using the penalized cubic splines method. During 12.4 years of follow up, 437 deaths were recorded. The HR for mortality, adjusted for sex, age, and community, for the lowest quartiles of the standard deviation of the normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) increased 1.51 times (95% CI 1.15-1.98) vs. the third quartile. Although mortality risk was attenuated after adjustment for several confounders and RHR, PRV-derived parameters of autonomic function showed significant non-linearity of association with mortality risk in the spline analysis. Conclusions: Low values of PRV-derived autonomic parameters were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in the general Japanese population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.