Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41523925›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026

Intraoperative Umbilical Perfusion Assessment Following Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Breast Reconstruction Using Indocyanine Green.

Nina Hadzimustafic, Emma Avery, Jeffrey Chen, Mahmud Zeidan, Siba Haykal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nina HadzimustaficFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Emma AveryFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jeffrey ChenDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Mahmud ZeidanDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Siba HaykalFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Prevention of wound complications of the neoumbilicus in deep inferior epigastric perforator breast reconstruction increases patient cosmetic satisfaction. The reported incidence of umbilical wound complications is between 3% and 18% in the current literature, necessitating improved prediction of such complications. Methods: The authors evaluated a retrospective cohort of 30 consecutive patients who underwent deep inferior epigastric perforator breast reconstruction during a 1.5-year period at the University Health Network by a single surgeon. Umbilical perfusion was intraoperatively measured by the SPY quantification of perfusion (QP) system with indocyanine green angiography. Postoperative outcomes were assessed in the outpatient clinic and classified as no wound complication, minor wound dehiscence, partial, or total necrosis. Results: A total of 30 patients were included: 19 with no complications, 2 had minor wounds, 3 had dehiscence, 3 had partial necrosis, and 3 had total necrosis. The average patient age was 50 ± 10 years; the average body mass index was 28 ± 4 kg/m Conclusions: Intraoperative indocyanine green angiography is an excellent adjunct to clinical assessment for predicting umbilical wound complications. A surgeon can use SPY-QP to make intraoperative decisions to improve outcomes if quantitative perfusion is poor.

Identifiers

PMID41523925
PMCPMC12783989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.