ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Trends in Lower Limb Orthoplastic Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Orthoplastic surgery integrates orthopedic and plastic surgical expertise and principles in the context of complex lower limb pathologies involving bone and soft tissue. Rapid advancements in the field have revolutionized the multidisciplinary approach to such conditions and have allowed for advancements in techniques used and outcomes achieved. We performed the first bibliometric analysis focused on the 100 most-cited articles related to lower limb orthoplastic surgery (LLOS) to analyze emerging trends and provide guidance for future research in the field. Methods: The 100 most-cited articles related to LLOS were identified on Web of Science across all databases and all years. Study details, including total citation count, study outcomes, primary orthoplastic pathology, and the modality used, were extracted, and the level of evidence was also assessed. Results: The 100 most-cited articles in LLOS were referenced by a total of 12,225 articles. Citation counts per article ranged significantly from 62 to 691 (mean: 103 ± 88.9). The majority of studies were retrospective cohorts (n = 59, mean citations: 139.8 ± 110.5). Only 1 study achieved level I status, highlighting a significant gap in methodological quality research within the field. Most studies focused on clinical outcomes (n = 88), whereas trauma and open fractures were the most common pathologies (n = 94), and flap coverage was the most common orthoplastic modality (n = 79) discussed. Conclusions: Overall, the majority of the most influential articles in LLOS are of lower level evidence. Future research should prioritize improving methodological rigor and applying orthoplastic principles beyond trauma care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.