ArticleJournal of emergencies, trauma, and shock
Outcomes of Patients with Aortic Diseases Treated by Antiemetic Drug, Who Were Transported by a Physician-staffed Helicopter in Japan.
Article in Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping the internationally reported evidence on physician-staffed helicopter transport in Japan: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Airborne Management of Acute Aortic Syndromes: Emerging Evidence for Antiemetic Use in Prehospital Care.Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shockArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Aortic diseases have been observed to manifest the symptoms such as nausea and vomiting. We conducted a retrospective investigation to ascertain the clinical significance of antiemetic drug use for patients with aortic diseases transported by a physician-staffed helicopter in Japan doctor helicopter (DH). A retrospective analysis, Japan DH registry system data. Methods: The following details of dispatch activity among the patients with aortic diseases were retrieved: age, sex, vital signs when contacted by the DH staff, contents of the medical intervention, duration of admission, and the final outcome. The subjects were divided into two groups: The control group, which did not receive antiemetic treatment in the prehospital setting and the anti-emetic group. The data were analyzed using Wilcoxon's test and the Chi-squared test. Results: A notable disparity emerged in the anti-emetic group ( Conclusions: In patients with aortic diseases, prehospital administration of antiemetic agents was associated with a lower heart rate, reduced need for tracheal intubation, improved OPC, and higher systolic BP upon contact with DH staff. These findings suggest that antiemetic treatment in the prehospital setting may contribute to hemodynamic stabilization and better clinical outcomes in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.