Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41523891›Full record

ReviewSpace science reviews2026

IMAP's Role in Understanding Particle Injection and Energization Throughout the Heliosphere.

C M S Cohen, B L Alterman, D N Baker, A Bruno, M Bzowski, E R Christian, I J Cohen, S Dalla, M A Dayeh, M I Desai and 21 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Space science reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The IMAP Magnetometer.Space science reviews · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

C M S CohenCalifornia Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0978-8127
B L AltermanHeliophysics Division, NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA.
D N BakerLaboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 USA.
A BrunoHeliophysics Division, NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA.
M BzowskiSpace Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences (CBK PAN), 00-716 Warsaw, Poland.
E R ChristianHeliophysics Division, NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA.
I J CohenJohns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723 USA.
S DallaUniversity of Lancashire, Preston, PR1 2HE UK.
M A DayehSouthwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX 78238 USA.
M I DesaiSouthwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX 78238 USA.
H A ElliottSouthwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX 78238 USA.
J GiacaloneLunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA.
M GkioulidouJohns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723 USA.
F GuoLos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87544 USA.
T HorburyImperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ UK.
S G KanekalHeliophysics Division, NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA.
I Kowalska-LeszczyńskaSpace Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences (CBK PAN), 00-716 Warsaw, Poland.
C O LeeSpace Sciences Laboratory, University of California - Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
G I LivadiotisDepartment of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA.
J G LuhmannSpace Sciences Laboratory, University of California - Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA.
W H MatthaeusDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 USA.
D J McComasDepartment of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA.
J G MitchellHeliophysics Division, NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA.
E MoebiusSpace Science Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824 USA.
J RankinDepartment of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA.
J D RichardsonKavli Center for Astrophysics and Space Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.
N A SchwadronSpace Science Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824 USA.
R SkougLos Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87544 USA.
D TurnerJohns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723 USA.
G ZankDepartment of Space Science, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899 USA.
E J ZirnsteinDepartment of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The payload of the Interstellar Mapping and Acceleration Probe (IMAP) includes sophisticated in situ instruments to measure solar wind plasma and magnetic fields, suprathermal and energetic particles at 1 au as well as unprecedented remote sensing instruments to observe the energetic neutral atoms (ENAs) in the outer heliosphere and the ultraviolet glow of the interstellar neutral H interacting with the three-dimensional solar wind. This unique combination of sensors on a single platform allows connections to be made between the inner and outer heliosphere to an extent never before possible. This article focuses on the scientific theme of connecting the physics of particle acceleration and transport throughout the heliosphere. Such studies enabled by IMAP are organized into three broad categories: i) fundamental particle acceleration and transport processes, ii) heliospheric variability that affects those processes, and iii) inner heliospheric science.

Indexed as

ENAsEnergetic particlesHeliosphereIMAPInterstellar mediumMagnetic fieldsPlasmaSolar windSpace weather

Identifiers

PMID41523891
PMCPMC12779750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.