ArticleOTO open
How Changing Signaling Volume Impacts the Importance of Away Rotations in the Otolaryngology Match.
Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Signaling was introduced to the otolaryngology match in 2021, with 5 signals allotted to applicants in 2021, 4 in 2022, 7 in 2023, and 25 in 2024. This study investigated the modifying effect of signaling volume on the relationship between away rotations and matching in otolaryngology from 2018 to 2024. Study Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: National survey of US medical students. Methods: We used the Texas Seeking Transparency in Application to Residency (STAR) survey responses of otolaryngology applicants from 2018 to 2024. Using multivariate logistic regression, we determined the odds of matching where away rotations were performed and how these odds varied across the pre-volume (2018-2020), low-volume (2021-2023), and high-volume (2024) signaling eras. Results: In total, 28.3% (n = 855) of otolaryngology applicants from 2018 to 2024 completed the Texas STAR survey. Using multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for applicant characteristics, and including an interaction term between performing away rotations and signaling time period, applicants in the high-volume signaling era were found to be significantly less likely to match at programs where away rotations were performed (odds ratio [OR]: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.33-0.95; Conclusion: The introduction of signaling and the recent increase in signal number are associated with decreased likelihood of matching at a program where an away rotation was performed compared to the pre-signaling era. Level of Evidence: V.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.