Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41523823›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2025

Technical Reading Comprehension in Preschool and Second-Grade Students.

Georgette A Morgan, Ji Young Kim, Mary K Short, Josie E Dress, R Douglas Greer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Georgette A MorganHealth Studies & Applied Educational Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8528-7773
Ji Young KimSchool of Behavioral Sciences and Education, Pennsylvania State University - Harrisburg, Middletown, PA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0520-1680
Mary K ShortHealth Studies & Applied Educational Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY USA.
Josie E DressHealth Studies & Applied Educational Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY USA.
R Douglas GreerHealth Studies & Applied Educational Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technical reading comprehension, a byproduct of read-do correspondence, refers to a student accurately reading and following written directions. Across two experiments, the present study evaluated the effects of a reader immersion procedure on the acquisition of read-do correspondence for preschool and second-grade students. The reader immersion procedure induces read-do correspondence as the participants must read a series of steps to access preferred stimuli. Within the first experiment, we tested the reader immersion procedure on the acquisition of read-do correspondence, as evidenced by read-draw and read-build responses, for four preschool students. The second experiment evaluated the effects of the reader immersion procedure on the acquisition of read-do correspondence, as evidenced by read-draw responses, for three second-grade students. All seven participants showed increases in read-do correspondence after the intervention. Implications for education and independent functioning are discussed. • Technical reading comprehension is a byproduct of read-do correspondence. • Educators can teach students to read and follow written instructions accurately by arranging the classroom environment and providing reinforcement. • Potential implication of this research, although not directly demonstrated, is that students may learn faster as they can independently complete tasks such as completing worksheets without the educator's direct instruction. • Students may also learn to function independently outside the classroom by responding to environmental stimuli such as stop signs, recipes, and instructional manuals.

Indexed as

EducationInstructional arrangementRead-do correspondenceReader immersion procedureTechnical reading comprehension

Identifiers

PMID41523823
PMCPMC12779873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.