ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2025
Exploring Interprofessional and Self-Compassion Competencies for Applied Behavior Analysis Professionals: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Call to Action for Qualitative Behavior Analysis.Behavior analysis in practice · 2026Article
- Addressing Pervasive Myths About Qualitative Research to Promote Methodological Diversity in Applied Behavior Analysis.Behavior analysis in practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interprofessional collaboration, or effective, emotionally responsive teaming between professionals, consists of several skill sets including strong communication skills, compassion and shared knowledge, and can enhance client goal attainment. The field of applied behavior analysis has recently focused on improving capacities of interprofessional collaboration and compassion among its professional workforce. Few studies have reported on perceptions of behavior analytic professionals vis a vis these skill sets in clinical settings. The purpose of this study was to describe participant perceptions of interprofessional collaboration and compassion in the context of applied behavior analytic practice. Following IRB approval, a total of 24 applied behavior analysis practitioner participants were recruited in two cohorts, all of whom participated in a 4-month long training-and-coaching intervention on interprofessional, compassion and self-compassion competencies. Qualitative data consisted of 13 recorded transcripts, including a needs-assessment focus group, as well as each training and coaching session, collected to gain understanding in how participants perceived these competencies. Transcripts were independently coded and analyzed via multistep reflexive thematic analysis by a pair of researchers. Ongoing qualitative analysis yielded the following themes: Historical Perspectives: How We Got Here, More Compassionate to Others Than to Self, Old me versus New me. This study revealed perceptions of barriers and supports embedded systemically in behavior analytic training and culture, affecting development of a collaborative and compassionate behavior analytic workforce. This work highlights the importance of qualitative methodology to enhance research in emerging practice areas through analysis of lived experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.