Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41523805›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2025

A Survey of Procedural-Fidelity Data Collection in Behavior-Analytic Practice.

Samantha Bergmann, Michael J Harman, Denys Brand, Jason C Vladescu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samantha BergmannDepartment of Behavior Analysis, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle #310919, Denton, TX 76203-5017 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7952-7179
Michael J HarmanDepartment of Psychology, Briar Cliff University, Sioux City, IA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3218-736X
Denys BrandDepartment of Psychology, California State University Sacramento, Sacramento, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8596-1975
Jason C VladescuSchool of Health Professions, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4391-9511

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluating the extent to which applied-behavior-analytic interventions are carried out accurately (i.e., procedural fidelity) is important for quality control, data-based decision making, and facilitating optimal consumer outcomes. This study explored several questions related to procedural fidelity in practice by distributing a survey to behavior analysts who currently supervise or provide applied-behavior-analytic services in any setting and with any population. Specifically, we were interested in learning more about who, how, how often, for what, why, and where behavior analysts assess procedural fidelity in practice. The results from 203 behavior analysts who completed the survey revealed that behavior analysts and their supervisees were most likely to collect fidelity data using checklists while directly observing behavior-analytic services in various settings. The most common barriers to collecting fidelity data in practice were a lack of resources, no requirement to do so by employers, and limited supervision time. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40617-024-00995-1.

Indexed as

Applied behavior analysisProcedural fidelityService deliverySupervisionTreatment integrity

Identifiers

PMID41523805
PMCPMC12779883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.