Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41523781›Full record

ArticleAffilia2026

Who Cares for Communities? Conceptualizing Non-Profit Work as Social Reproduction Through the Case of Food Banks.

Meghan Mendelin, Rebecca Jane Hall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Affilia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Meghan MendelinGlobal Development Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0396-1802
Rebecca Jane HallGlobal Development Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article conceptualizes non-profit labour as a form of social reproduction, a feminist political economy category that refers to the labour involved in the making of life and tending to it. In the contemporary context of neoliberal austerity in Canada, non-profit organizations have increasingly stepped in to fill widening gaps in essential social provisioning. The predominantly female non-profit workforce within these organizations, parallel to feminized household labour, faces systemic undervaluation and invisibilization, reflected in low wages, chronic underfunding, and austerity policies that work to destabilize the sector as a whole. Via the case study of food banks, we seek to make visible these vital, life-sustaining and community reproducing labours, drawing attention to their political agency and social power. While we write from within critiques of food banks as a symptom of neoliberal retrenchment, we resist conflating the labour and relationships within these organizations with the critiques of the political economic conditions in which they operate. Instead, we argue that the labours of social reproduction that occur within food banks hold political potential that is at odds with the (ostensibly) depoliticized approach to charity that is favoured in neoliberal modes of social provisioning. Providing food for communities, like other social reproduction activities, is not merely a response to gaps in formal government or market provisioning, but is agentic life-making labour driven by dictates beyond capital accumulation.

Indexed as

care workfood banksneoliberalismnon-profit organizationssocial reproduction

Identifiers

PMID41523781
PMCPMC12782308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.