Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41523762›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of experimental medicine2025

Comparative outcome analyses of stromal vascular fraction

Naveen Jeyaraman, Sandeep Shrivastava, Ravi Velamoor Rangarajan, Arulkumar Nallakumarasamy, Swaminathan Ramasubramanian, Sathish Muthu, Madhan Jeyaraman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of experimental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Naveen JeyaramanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha 442004, Maharashtra, India.
Sandeep ShrivastavaDepartment of Orthopaedics, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha 442004, Maharashtra, India.
Ravi Velamoor RangarajanDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Mother Cell Regenerative Centre, Tiruchirappalli 620017, Tamil Nadu, India.
Arulkumar NallakumarasamyDepartment of Orthopaedics, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha 442004, Maharashtra, India.
Swaminathan RamasubramanianDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Agathisha Institute of Stemcell and Regenerative Medicine, Chennai 600030, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sathish MuthuDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Agathisha Institute of Stemcell and Regenerative Medicine, Chennai 600030, Tamil Nadu, India.
Madhan JeyaramanDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Agathisha Institute of Stemcell and Regenerative Medicine, Chennai 600030, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a prevalent degenerative joint disease that significantly impairs quality of life and functional mobility. Emerging regenerative therapies, such as stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and nanofat, have demonstrated potential in cartilage repair and symptom alleviation. However, comparative clinical evidence evaluating their efficacy and safety remains limited.

aimTo compare the clinical outcomes of SVF

methodsConducted at Mother Cell Regenerative Centre, Trichy, over 18 months (June 2025 to December 2026), the study will enroll 30 patients, randomly assigned to two groups of 15 each. Both interventions will be administered as a single intra-articular injection under sterile conditions, with cell viability (> 85%) confirmed by a standardized assay. Group A will receive autologous SVF injections, while Group B will receive autologous nanofat injections. The primary outcome measure is the change in pain scores at 12 months using the visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include functional improvement assessed by Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, cartilage regeneration evaluated

resultsThis study aims to evaluate pain reduction at 12 months post-injection, using the VAS as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include functional improvement (KOOS, WOMAC, IKDC), cartilage regeneration (T2 cartigram), adverse event incidence, patient satisfaction (standardized questionnaires, Likert scale), and quality of life (EQ-5D). Ethical considerations follow the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice, with IRB approval and participant informed consent ensured. Confidentiality and data security comply with regulations, and a Data Safety Monitoring Board oversees trial safety. Results will be shared via peer-reviewed journals, presentations at international orthopedic conferences, and detailed summaries for stakeholders and participants. The trial is registered under CTRI/2024/03/064076. Findings emphasize patient-centered advancements in knee osteoarthritis management.

conclusionThis trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of SVF and nanofat therapies in knee OA, addressing a significant evidence gap. It employs robust methods to enhance cartilage repair and patient quality of life. Future research should standardize dosages, protocols, and injection techniques, explore autologous/allogenic preparations, and advance radiological tools, broadening accessibility and clinical applications.

Indexed as

Cartilage regenerationNanofatOsteoarthritisRandomized controlled trialRegenerative therapyStromal vascular fraction

Identifiers

PMID41523762
PMCPMC12781693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.