ArticleWorld journal of experimental medicine2025
Comparative outcome analyses of stromal vascular fraction
Article in World journal of experimental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Evaluation of Exosomes, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, and Nanofat on Cartilage Graft Viability in a Rat Model.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Evaluating the Efficacy of Adipose-Derived Stromal Vascular Fraction Injection for Early-Stage Knee Osteoarthritis: A Multicenter Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOsteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a prevalent degenerative joint disease that significantly impairs quality of life and functional mobility. Emerging regenerative therapies, such as stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and nanofat, have demonstrated potential in cartilage repair and symptom alleviation. However, comparative clinical evidence evaluating their efficacy and safety remains limited.
aimTo compare the clinical outcomes of SVF
methodsConducted at Mother Cell Regenerative Centre, Trichy, over 18 months (June 2025 to December 2026), the study will enroll 30 patients, randomly assigned to two groups of 15 each. Both interventions will be administered as a single intra-articular injection under sterile conditions, with cell viability (> 85%) confirmed by a standardized assay. Group A will receive autologous SVF injections, while Group B will receive autologous nanofat injections. The primary outcome measure is the change in pain scores at 12 months using the visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes include functional improvement assessed by Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, cartilage regeneration evaluated
resultsThis study aims to evaluate pain reduction at 12 months post-injection, using the VAS as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include functional improvement (KOOS, WOMAC, IKDC), cartilage regeneration (T2 cartigram), adverse event incidence, patient satisfaction (standardized questionnaires, Likert scale), and quality of life (EQ-5D). Ethical considerations follow the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice, with IRB approval and participant informed consent ensured. Confidentiality and data security comply with regulations, and a Data Safety Monitoring Board oversees trial safety. Results will be shared via peer-reviewed journals, presentations at international orthopedic conferences, and detailed summaries for stakeholders and participants. The trial is registered under CTRI/2024/03/064076. Findings emphasize patient-centered advancements in knee osteoarthritis management.
conclusionThis trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of SVF and nanofat therapies in knee OA, addressing a significant evidence gap. It employs robust methods to enhance cartilage repair and patient quality of life. Future research should standardize dosages, protocols, and injection techniques, explore autologous/allogenic preparations, and advance radiological tools, broadening accessibility and clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.