ArticleCureus2026
An Outpatient Cross-Sectional Study of Physicians' Empathy From the Patients' Perspective: A Comparison of the Arabic Version of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure Across Four Disciplines.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose Empathy plays a crucial role in the patient-physician relationship and is often regarded as a key determinant of effective medical care. This study aimed to validate the Arabic version of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure and compare patients' perceptions of physician empathy across four medical specialties. Materials and methods A cross-sectional, survey-based design was employed. Participants were randomly selected from family medicine, general surgery, internal medicine, and orthopedics clinics (36 patients per specialty). The investigators individually assisted each patient in completing the Arabic version of the CARE measure, which measured the level of empathy perceived during their medical consultation. After translation, a validation study for the Arabic version was conducted. The mean CARE scores across the four specialties were analyzed using nonparametric tests, namely the Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis test, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results A significant association was found between physicians' specialties and patients' perceptions of empathy levels (p = 0.047). Family medicine physicians had the highest mean empathy scores, while orthopedic surgeons had the lowest. Patients' marital status was significantly associated with their perception of their doctors' empathy (p = 0.032), with married patients reporting the highest level of empathy and single patients the lowest. The (CARE) measure demonstrated high reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.926. Conclusions Patients' perceptions of doctors' empathy were significantly higher among family medicine physicians than among orthopedic surgeons. It shows that the Arabic version of the CARE measure has strong psychometric properties and is valid for use in similar outpatient settings. The results indicate the need to enhance the training curricula of medical programs in general and surgical programs in particular.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.