ArticleCureus2026
Outcomes of Femoral Neck System Procedures in a Major Trauma Centre.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Femoral neck fractures are common in elderly patients due to osteoporosis and falls. A significant complication is avascular necrosis (AVN), leading to bone tissue death and joint dysfunction. The Femoral Neck System (FNS) was developed to provide minimally invasive fixation with improved rotational and angular stability, aiming to reduce AVN risk; however, clinically significant complications still occur. Hence, this study aimed to assess complication and reoperation rates following femoral neck fracture fixation using FNS in a major trauma centre, and to compare these findings with published outcomes and alternative fixation strategies. Methodology A retrospective review of patients treated with FNS at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Major Trauma Centre between 2019 and 2024 was conducted. Collected variables included demographics, comorbidities, injury mechanism, time to surgery, fracture displacement, Garden and Pauwels classification, reduction quality, and postoperative outcomes. Reduction quality was evaluated independently by two blinded orthopaedic surgeons using the Garden Alignment Index. Failures were categorised into AVN, mechanical failure, non-union, infection, or re-operation. Results Of the 70 eligible patients, 67 had complete data. The mean age was 73.6 years. The overall complication rate was 22.4%, with 19.4% requiring re-operation. Excluding early postoperative death, these increased to 25.9% and 22.4%, respectively. Reduction was acceptable in 79.1% of cases. Poor reduction was associated with higher complication rates (38.5% vs. 19.0%, p = 0.04). AVN represented 60% of complications, followed by mechanical failure (20%), non-union (13%), and deep infection (7%). Complications were more frequent in patients aged <65 years (43.8%) versus those aged ≥65 years (19.0%). No significant associations were identified with fracture displacement, injury mechanism, gender, or surgical timing. Conclusions Despite its biomechanical advantages, FNS may be associated with higher complication rates, particularly in younger patients and vertically orientated fracture patterns. Vertically aligned fractures (Pauwels III, Garden III-IV) and suboptimal reduction are strong predictors of failure. Further prospective comparative studies are required to better define the role of FNS in femoral neck fracture management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.