ReviewCureus2026
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Post-stroke Motor Recovery: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for post stroke rehabilitation-a single center community experience.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used as an additional treatment for stroke recovery. Stroke is a major cause of disability in the UK, often leaving survivors with ongoing motor problems. There are different theories on motor recovery after stroke, with some suggesting that undamaged pathways in the brain help compensate for the damage, while others propose that the healthy side of the brain takes over the lost functions. Additionally, there is a model suggesting that the brain's hemispheres compete, with the healthy side inhibiting the affected side. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) uses electromagnetic pulses to stimulate specific areas of the brain, aiming to enhance new pathways and improve patients' ability to move. Studies have shown that rTMS can be effective and safe in stroke rehabilitation, leading to better motor performance. Integrating rTMS into standard stroke rehabilitation programs could have significant benefits; however, more research is needed to determine the best treatment parameters and identify which patients could benefit the most. It is also important to combine rTMS with other therapies, such as physical and occupational therapy, for a comprehensive approach. This review highlights the potential of rTMS as an additional treatment for stroke recovery. By stimulating the brain, rTMS may help improve motor function and enhance rehabilitation outcomes. Further studies are necessary to optimize its use and determine its effectiveness in different stroke patient groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.