ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2026
Characterizing the effects of noncontrast head CT reconstruction kernel and slice thickness parameters on the performance of an automated AI algorithm in the evaluation of ischemic stroke.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: There are multiple commercially available, Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared, artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools automating stroke evaluation in noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT). This study assessed the impact of variations in reconstruction kernel and slice thickness on two outputs of such a system: hypodense volume and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS). Approach: The NCCT series image data of 67 patients imaged with a CT stroke protocol were reconstructed with four kernels (H10s-smooth, H40s-medium, H60s-sharp, and H70h-very sharp) and three slice thicknesses (1.5, 3.0, and 5.0 mm) to create 1 reference condition (H40s/5.0 mm) and 11 nonreference conditions. The 12 reconstructions per patient were processed with a commercially available FDA-cleared software package that yields total hypodense volume (mL) and ASPECTS. A mixed-effect model was used to test the difference in hypodense volume, and an ordered logistic model was used to test the difference in e-ASPECTS. Results: Hypodense volume differences from the reference condition ranged from Conclusions: Automated hypodense volume measured with a commercially available, FDA-cleared software package is substantially impacted by reconstruction kernel and slice thickness. Conversely, automated ASPECTS is invariant to these reconstruction parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.