Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41523666›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2026

Characterizing the effects of noncontrast head CT reconstruction kernel and slice thickness parameters on the performance of an automated AI algorithm in the evaluation of ischemic stroke.

Spencer H Welland, Grace Hyun J Kim, Anil Yadav, Kambiz Nael, John M Hoffman, Matthew S Brown, Michael F McNitt-Gray, William Hsu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Spencer H WellandDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6734-8579
Grace Hyun J KimDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1225-3489
Anil YadavDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7720-5702
Kambiz NaelUCSF School of Medicine, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, San Francisco, California, United States.
John M HoffmanDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7934-939X
Matthew S BrownDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Michael F McNitt-GrayDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3004-4613
William HsuDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5168-070X

Funding

Computational Toolkit for Normalizing the Impact of CT Acquisition and Reconstruction on Quantitative Image FeaturesR01EB031993 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HSU, WILLIAM, MCNITT-GRAY, MICHAEL F · 2022 to 2024
$2.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB031993
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: There are multiple commercially available, Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared, artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools automating stroke evaluation in noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT). This study assessed the impact of variations in reconstruction kernel and slice thickness on two outputs of such a system: hypodense volume and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS). Approach: The NCCT series image data of 67 patients imaged with a CT stroke protocol were reconstructed with four kernels (H10s-smooth, H40s-medium, H60s-sharp, and H70h-very sharp) and three slice thicknesses (1.5, 3.0, and 5.0 mm) to create 1 reference condition (H40s/5.0 mm) and 11 nonreference conditions. The 12 reconstructions per patient were processed with a commercially available FDA-cleared software package that yields total hypodense volume (mL) and ASPECTS. A mixed-effect model was used to test the difference in hypodense volume, and an ordered logistic model was used to test the difference in e-ASPECTS. Results: Hypodense volume differences from the reference condition ranged from Conclusions: Automated hypodense volume measured with a commercially available, FDA-cleared software package is substantially impacted by reconstruction kernel and slice thickness. Conversely, automated ASPECTS is invariant to these reconstruction parameters.

Indexed as

Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Scorecomputed tomographyhypodense volumeischemic strokereconstruction kernelslice thickness

Identifiers

PMID41523666
PMCPMC12782953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.