Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41523658›Full record

ArticleJB & JS open access

Outcomes of Vertebral Body Tethering in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Prospective, Multicenter Study.

Hans K Nugraha, Lawrence L Haber, Daniel G Hoernschemeyer, Patrick J Cahill, Amer F Samdani, Firoz Miyanji, Peter O Newton, A Noelle Larson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hans K NugrahaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7566-6980
Lawrence L HaberOchsner Children's Hospital, New Orleans, Los Angeles.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9471-3794
Daniel G HoernschemeyerUniversity of Missouri Health Care, Columbia, Missouri.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8502-5754
Patrick J CahillDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7129-1007
Amer F SamdaniShriners Children's Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4206-610X
Firoz MiyanjiBritish Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3023-3660
Peter O NewtonRady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9437-7973
A Noelle LarsonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6542-6975

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vertebral body tethering (VBT) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is an alternative to posterior fusion. There are limited prospective, multicenter data available on VBT following US Food and Drug Administration approval. We hypothesize that curve correction on first postoperative standing (first erect, FE) imaging is associated with higher rates of successful correction at final follow-up. Methods: All qualifying patients with AIS who underwent thoracic and lumbar VBT between 2019 and 2022 were prospectively enrolled from 9 institutions. Radiographic and clinical data were compared preoperatively, at FE, and at final follow-up with minimum of 2 years. Success was defined as major curve magnitude of ≤35° at final follow-up and no fusion surgery. Results: One hundred twenty-seven patients were enrolled (79.5% female), with mean follow-up 2.4 years. Mean age at surgery was 12.9 ± 1.4 years, most had bone age of Sanders 4 or lower (93/112, 83.0%). In average, 7.6 ± 1.7 levels were tethered. Mean preoperative major curve magnitude was 50 ± 8°, with mean initial correction at FE of 29 ± 8° (% correction, 39 ± 18%). At final follow-up, mean curve magnitude was maintained at 26 ± 11° (% correction, 45 ± 23%) despite 29% of tether breakage. Patients who had mean FE curve magnitude of ≤35° were 88% successful compared with only 60% in those with >35° on FE (p = 0.0021). Patients showed stable sagittal alignment across all timepoints. Scoliosis Research Society-22 scores improved significantly by 2 years (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: This was the first prospective, multicenter study to assess outcomes of VBT for patients with AIS. VBT shows promise, but optimal results may depend on careful patient selection and surgical technique. FE major curve magnitude of ≤35° was associated with 88% success rate compared with only 60% success for those with poor correction. Level of Evidence: Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Identifiers

PMID41523658
PMCPMC12784004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.