ArticleBioinformatics advances2026
Beyond synthetic lethality in large-scale metabolic and regulatory network models via genetic minimal intervention set.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- gMISpy: integration of complex regulatory networks and genome scale metabolic models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: The integration of genome-scale metabolic and regulatory networks has received significant interest in cancer systems biology. However, the identification of lethal genetic interventions in these integrated models remains challenging due to the combinatorial explosion of potential solutions. To address this, we developed the genetic Minimal Cut Set (gMCS) framework, which computes synthetic lethal interactions-minimal sets of gene knockouts that are lethal for cellular proliferation- in genome-scale metabolic networks with signed directed acyclic regulatory pathways. Here, we present a novel formulation to calculate genetic Minimal Intervention Sets, gMISs, which incorporate both gene knockouts and knock-ins. Results: With our gMIS approach, we assessed the landscape of lethal genetic interactions in human cells, capturing interventions beyond synthetic lethality, including synthetic dosage lethality and tumor suppressor gene complexes. We applied the concept of synthetic dosage lethality to predict essential genes in cancer and demonstrated a significant increase in sensitivity when compared to large-scale gene knockout screen data. We also analyzed tumor suppressors in cancer cell lines and identified lethal gene knock-in strategies. Finally, we demonstrate how gMISs can help uncover potential therapeutic targets, providing examples in hematological malignancies. Availability and implementation: The gMCSpy Python package now includes gMIS functionalities. Access: https://github.com/PlanesLab/gMCSpy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.