ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2025
Enhancing research ethics and protections for uninsured and underinsured research participants in clinical trials in the USA.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Representation of women and historically underserved populations in hypertension and diabetes clinical trials at Federally Qualified Health Centers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inclusion of uninsured and underinsured (UUI) individuals in clinical research (CR) is necessary to ensure data quality, diversity, generalizability and fairness. Yet, in the USA, UUI persons tend to be excluded from CR. We conducted an ethical analysis of: the regulatory and ethics literature related to protections of, and duty to care for, research participants from vulnerable groups; the nature and scope of the ancillary health care obligations of researchers, and the applicable laws, regulations and practices concerning the care for UUI participants. We consider six examples illustrating the challenges of including UUI persons in CR. We note that addressing fully the challenges of UUI participation in CR requires comprehensive legal and health care reforms. We maintain that even in the absence of such reforms, researchers, study sponsors and Institutional Review Boards can and ought to adopt an inclusive approach to the recruitment of UUI individuals to improve data quality, diversity, generalizability and social justice. We propose such a systematic, proactive and ethically sound approach. It considers the medical and ancillary care needs of UUI participants, addresses them in the study protocol and budget, and includes referral to community health resources, follow-up support, and noting assistance in the research records.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.