ReviewJournal of clinical and translational science2025
Unlocking the potential of Contract Research Organizations in Africa's clinical trials ecosystem.
Review in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Disease registries as foundational infrastructure for Contract Research Organisations in Africa.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite representing 18% of the world's population and 20% of the disease burden, only an estimated 2% of global clinical trials include at least one study site in Africa. This underscores the critical need for continued research on how to overcome clinical trial challenges on the continent. In countries with established reputations for clinical trials, Contract Research Organizations (CROs) play a vital role, accounting for half of the research workforce and effectively managing clinical trials for pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and medical device companies. In contrast, the potential of CROs in Africa's clinical trials ecosystem remains largely unexplored. This narrative review discusses the challenges, opportunities, best practices, emerging trends, and prospects of clinical trials in Africa. Major challenges in clinical trial implementation in Africa stem from gaps in financial and human resources, infrastructure, and regulatory systems, while opportunities are linked to Africa's large population, genetic diversity, disease burden, lower operating costs, positive economic outlook, and growing interest from global health and research players. Emerging trends, such as the decentralization of clinical trials and conducting trials during public health emergencies, offer promising avenues for maintaining research continuity. Ultimately, the paper proposes a context-specific framework, aimed at maximizing the effectiveness of CROs in the continent's clinical trials ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.