ReviewCureus2025
Long-Term Stability and Safety of Orthognathic-Orthodontic Correction for Skeletal Anterior Open Bite: A Systematic Review and Evidence Appraisal.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combined use of microimplants and a self-made four-curvature torquing auxiliary arch to manage labial root fenestration of the maxillary incisors: A case report.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Clinical and perioperative outcomes of computer-guided versus conventional plan-transfer workflows in orthognathic surgery for skeletal anterior open bite: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review evaluated the long-term stability and complication profile of combined orthodontic and orthognathic surgical treatment for managing skeletal anterior open-bite (AOB) in adolescents and adults. An electronic search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar identified English-language clinical studies (published from January 2004 to September 2025) that included at least one group treated with combined orthodontic and orthognathic surgical correction. Nonsurgical comparators such as skeletal-anchorage-based intrusion or orthodontic camouflage were also included when comparable outcomes were reported. Twenty studies, comprising predominantly retrospective cohort studies, met the eligibility criteria. Data extraction focused on study design, sample characteristics, surgical and orthodontic protocols, follow-up duration, cephalometric changes, relapse, complications, functional outcomes, and patient-reported measures. Risk of bias was assessed with Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies, and certainty of evidence was summarized using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Most surgical protocols used Le Fort I maxillary impaction alone or in combination with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and counterclockwise mandibular rotation. Across the included studies, AOB was consistently converted to a positive overbite, with mean improvements and long-term preservation of the initial skeletal correction. Skeletal-anchorage-based molar intrusion achieved comparable overbite closure through posterior intrusion and mandibular autorotation, with a reduction in lower anterior facial height and limited incisor elongation. The reported relapse rates were frequently associated with persisting myofunctional habits and unfavorable baseline skeletal patterns. Complications were generally infrequent and mild; the most common findings were transient temporomandibular symptoms or neurosensory disturbances, and serious or life-threatening events and reoperations were rare. The overall certainty of evidence was mainly moderate for stability and cephalometric outcomes and low for complications due to methodological limitations. Within these constraints, combined orthodontic and orthognathic surgery appears to provide reliable functional and esthetic improvement for skeletal AOB, with skeletal anchorage representing a less invasive alternative in carefully selected adult patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.