Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41523493›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

The Ripple Effect: Applying Positive Psychology Principles in Debriefing to Transform Team Culture.

David O Kessler, Jordyn Feingold, Rachel Elkin, Mirette Dube, Jennifer Reid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David O KesslerEmergency Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City, USA.
Jordyn FeingoldPsychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City, USA.
Rachel ElkinEmergency Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York City, USA.
Mirette DubeRespiratory Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, USA.
Jennifer ReidPediatric Emergency Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare is a complex system filled with high-stress and high-stakes situations that can put workers at risk for burnout and prime negative patterns of thinking. When an individual's job entails constantly searching for problems or areas of improvement, as in medicine, they can become "stuck" in this paradigm, which may then spill over into social interactions and further compound negative workplace culture. Simulation programs can be effective levers for positive culture change, promoting a growth mindset, learning orientation, and culture of safety. The field of positive psychology can further enhance this by providing specific and explicit tools that help shift individual and team mindsets toward a more positive orientation attuned to what is working well and thereby promote cultures of well-being and resilience. The simulation's position as an organizational node, with influence that extends beyond the learning environment, makes it uniquely situated to ripple these positive effects through teams, professions, and departments. In this technical report, we explore how core tenets of positive psychology can be leveraged within healthcare settings, where they intersect with concepts already present in debriefing practices, and how to intentionally apply strategies that promote positive workplace culture and individual resiliency. Our goal is to provide a practical guide for integrating positive psychology into simulation and debriefing programs, with a focus on conceptual framing, pragmatic strategies, and implementation tools that support clinician well-being and foster culture change in healthcare.

Indexed as

behavioral interventionculture changehealthcare simulationphysician well-beingpositive psychology

Identifiers

PMID41523493
PMCPMC12790399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.