Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41523479›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Prescription Audit as a Quality Improvement Tool: Impact of Repeated Interventions in Paediatric Outpatient Department (OPD) and Inpatient Department (IPD) Settings.

Prajwal B Gadgeesh, Vikram Sakaleshpur Kumar, Niveditha Hegde Venkatramana, Latha S P

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Prajwal B GadgeeshPediatrics and Neonatology, Subbaiah Institute of Medical Sciences, Shivamogga, IND.
Vikram Sakaleshpur KumarPediatrics and Child Health, Subbaiah Institute of Medical Sciences, Shivamogga, IND.
Niveditha Hegde VenkatramanaPediatrics, Subbaiah Institute of Medical Sciences, Shivamogga, IND.
Latha S PPediatrics and Neonatology, Subbaiah Institute of Medical Sciences, Shivamogga, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background In many low- and middle-income country (LMIC) hospitals, prescription auditing is rare due to limited digital infrastructure and weak quality-assurance systems. We evaluated whether repeated audit-feedback cycles could improve prescription completeness and rational drug use in an LMIC tertiary pediatric setting. Methodology Prospective, repeated cross-sectional audits (10 cycles; Nov 2023-Nov 2024) were performed in Pediatrics/Neonatology at a tertiary hospital in India. Cycles used a manual, paper-based process with structured feedback and brief prescriber education; a re-audit occurred eight months later (Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model). The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a targeted audit and feedback intervention as a strategy to achieve sustained improvement in the overall quality of prescribing practices and documentation standards within our paediatric facility over consecutive PDSA cycles. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26 (Released 2018; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) with the Cochran-Armitage Trend Test for trend and paired

Indexed as

antibiotic stewardshiplmiclow-resource hospitalspdsapediatric pharmacologyprescription auditquality improvementwho indicators

Identifiers

PMID41523479
PMCPMC12790137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.