Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41523465›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Retrospective Study on the Use of C-reactive Protein and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio as Predictive Markers to Prevent Unnecessary Appendicectomy.

Harrison H Gregory, Baillie W Ferris, Michael C Auld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Harrison H GregoryDepartment of Surgery, Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich, AUS.
Baillie W FerrisDepartment of Surgery, Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich, AUS.
Michael C AuldDepartment of Surgery, Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich, AUS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSymptomatology of acute appendicitis is a common presentation in children and biochemical markers are often utilised to differentiate acute appendicitis from other pathologies. The aim of this study is to assess the utility of C-reactive protein (CRP) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio compared to standard biochemical markers in predicting acute appendicitis and preventing unnecessary appendicectomy.

methodsThis is a single-centre retrospective cohort study of paediatric patients <16 years who presented to Ipswich Hospital with symptomatology of acute appendicitis between January 2019 to January 2024. Five hundred ninety-three patients were screened against inclusion/exclusion criteria and 582 patients were available for analysis.

resultsThe study identified CRP (OR 1.009), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (OR 0.909), neutrophil count (OR 1.222), and lymphocyte count (OR 0.708) to be significant coefficients in predicting acute appendicitis following logistic regression analysis. CRP was found to be a superior predictor of acute appendicitis following receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis (area under the curve (AUC) 0.712, sensitivity 75.60%, specificity 61.48%, p<0.001) compared to NLR, neutrophil and lymphocyte count.

conclusionIn this large study, we have validated the effectiveness of certain biomarkers as predictive markers for acute appendicitis in children, potentially reducing the risk of unnecessary appendicectomy. CRP is superior to NLR, neutrophil and lymphocyte count in predicting acute appendicitis. The use of CRP, in addition to other markers such as NLR, is valuable in preventing unnecessary appendicectomy.

Indexed as

appendicectomyappendicitisbiochemical markersc-reactive proteingeneral surgery

Identifiers

PMID41523465
PMCPMC12788886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.