Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41523452›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Comparative Effectiveness of Triphala and Conventional Root Canal Irrigants in Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review.

Pranjal Chavan, Padawe Dimple, Vilas Takate

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pranjal ChavanDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Government Dental College and Hospital, Mumbai, Mumbai, IND.
Padawe DimpleDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Government Dental College and Hospital, Mumbai, Mumbai, IND.
Vilas TakateDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Government Dental College and Hospital, Mumbai, Mumbai, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Triphala, a traditional Ayurvedic herbal formulation, as a root canal irrigant in primary teeth compared to conventional irrigants such as sodium hypochlorite, chlorhexidine, and saline. A comprehensive electronic search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, and supplemented by grey literature. Studies published in English between January 2000 and February 2025 were considered. Five studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising randomized controlled trials, in vitro, and ex vivo studies, all of which were conducted in India. The findings revealed that Triphala possesses significant antimicrobial activity against endodontic pathogens such as

Indexed as

antimicrobial efficacypediatric endodonticsprimary teethroot canal irrigantstriphala

Identifiers

PMID41523452
PMCPMC12781542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.