ReviewCureus2025
Consensus-Based Interventions for Cervical and Lumbar Facet Joint Pain and Sacroiliac Joint Disorders: A Concise Summary of International Practice Guidelines.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical and lumbar facet joint interventions and sacroiliac joint injections are some of the most frequent interventions done in interventional pain medicine. Various detailed guidelines have been developed by international, multispecialty societies and panels, including the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN), to guide clinical decision-making. However, these extensive documents are often hard to apply within the time limits of clinical practice. We compared and summarized three international working groups' and ASPN's published consensus guidelines' recommendations. The summary focuses on diagnostic criteria, procedure guidelines, and follow-up. All three guidelines emphasize the use of controlled diagnostic blocks, fluoroscopic or CT guidance, and consideration of radiofrequency ablation following diagnostic confirmation. Functional improvement and ≥50-80% pain relief thresholds are significant criteria for procedural progression. These brief summaries give pain physicians an easily accessible clinical guide to evidence-based consensus on spinal interventions. Full credit is given to the original guideline publications for their comprehensive work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.