ArticleCureus2025
Comparison of the Prognostic Performance of the Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP) and Emergency Room Assessment of Acute Pancreatitis (ERAP) Scores in Acute Pancreatitis.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly identification of severe acute pancreatitis (AP) is crucial for timely intervention, optimal resource utilization, and better outcomes. Although several scoring systems exist, their accuracy and applicability in emergency settings remain uncertain. This study evaluated the prognostic accuracy of the Emergency Room Assessment of Acute Pancreatitis (ERAP) score and compared it with the Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP) score for predicting severe AP, mortality, and organ failure in an Indian population and emergency settings. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a prospective observational study in the Department of Trauma and Emergency at All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Nagpur, between December 2023 and January 2025. Patients over 18 years old diagnosed with AP using the Revised Atlanta Criteria were included. Admission data were used to calculate ERAP and BISAP scores. Predictive accuracy for severe AP, mortality, and organ failure was assessed via the area under the curve (AUC).
resultsAmong 165 patients (mean age 37.9 ± 12.1 years), alcohol (139 (84.2%)) was the predominant cause for AP. Severe AP occurred in 31 (18.8%). The ERAP and BISAP scores showed AUCs of 0.852 vs. 0.784 for severe AP, 0.853 vs. 0.778 for mortality, and 0.843 vs. 0.844 for any organ failure, with an optimal cutoff ≥ 2 for both. ERAP demonstrated numerically higher prognostic accuracy than BISAP for severe AP (
conclusionsERAP showed slightly higher but statistically insignificant predictive accuracy than BISAP, suggesting ERAP as an alternative for early risk stratification in emergency settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.