Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41523373›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Knowledge and Opinions of Secondary School Teachers on Teaching the Subject of Sex Education.

Kyriaki Evdaimon, Kleanthi Gourounti, Athina Diamanti, Victoria Vivilaki, Angeliki Sarella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kyriaki EvdaimonDepartment of Midwifery, University of West Attica, Athens, GRC.
Kleanthi GourountiDepartment of Midwifery, University of West Attica, Athens, GRC.
Athina DiamantiDepartment of Midwifery, University of West Attica, Athens, GRC.
Victoria VivilakiDepartment of Midwifery, University of West Attica, Athens, GRC.
Angeliki SarellaDepartment of Midwifery, University of West Attica, Athens, GRC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe study aims to investigate the knowledge and opinions of secondary school teachers regarding the sexual and reproductive health of adolescents and the teaching of the sex education course.  Methods: The research was carried out with a structured questionnaire. Samples were first pilot tested, and the value of the Cronbach alpha index was calculated, which highlights its reliability since it was equal to 0.72. The statistical analysis was carried out using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0 (Released 2019; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States), where, for the questions with a Likert-type scale, the frequency, percentage, median, and interquartile range were calculated, while, for the categorical variables, the frequency and percentage were calculated. To investigate whether a quantitative variable differed between two levels, a t-test was used, and to investigate correlations between quantitative variables, the value of the Pearson linear correlation coefficient was calculated. The statistical significance level for all tests was 5%.  Results: The study included 192 secondary school teachers with an average age of 48.04 years, and 124 (64.4%) were women. The average time in service was 15.14 years, and 39.6% (n=76) worked in schools in the Attica region. One hundred and sixty (83.2%) need additional training and want both appropriate educational material (93.6%) and training seminars (90.8%). One hundred and sixty-five (85.7%) believe that sex education should be taught by qualified teachers, and 39.3% (n=75) of teachers consider that high school is the most appropriate level of education, while 37.7% (n=72) consider primary school. The majority of the sample believes that sex education should be taught as a subject integrated into the curriculum of other subjects (65.7%), as a chapter of health education (63.5%), or as an independent subject (57.8%). Comparatively, the level of knowledge between teachers in the health sector and those in other specialties, having taken into account the 156 teachers who had answered the specific questions, appears to differ (t(156)=-3.61; p<0.001), with the former having a higher level of knowledge. Finally, the level of knowledge in the psychosexual development of children differs between teachers who have attended a training program related to sex education and those who have not (t(156)=- 2.35; p=0.020), with the former again having a higher level of knowledge.  Conclusion: The study highlights that, while educators recognize the importance of sex education (ideally delivered by qualified staff), there is a significant lack of adequate training and educational resources. The finding that teachers with a health background or previous training demonstrated a statistically higher knowledge level (p<0.001 and p=0.020, respectively) emphasizes the critical need for organized seminars and certified materials to ensure the effective implementation of the curriculum in schools.

Indexed as

educational seminarssecondary school teacherssex educationsexual educationsexual health

Identifiers

PMID41523373
PMCPMC12788699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.