Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41523316›Full record

ReviewPlant and soil2025

A bottom-up perspective on how fire changes ecosystem biogeochemistry via plant-soil interactions.

Adam Pellegrini, Giacomo Certini, Minerva García-Carmona, Carmen Sánchez-García

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant and soil, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adam PellegriniDepartment of Earth System Science, Doerr School of Sustainability, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0418-4129
Giacomo CertiniDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Minerva García-CarmonaDepartment of Agrochemistry and Environment, University of Miguel Hernández de Elche, Alicante, Spain.
Carmen Sánchez-GarcíaCentre for Wildfire Research, Department of Geography, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: The effect of fire on plants and soils cannot be viewed in isolation. Plant-soil interactions, and their role in determining the response of ecosystem to fire, has been a widely debated topic. Most studies describe patterns rather than the mechanisms that may lead to variable effects on soils across ecosystems. Methods: In this mini-review, we compile the literature on fire effects on soil processes to propose that a bottom-up framework considering plant-soil interactions is needed to explain the myriad of effects that fire has on soil biogeochemistry. Results: We highlight a number of processes that may be at play: (i) soil carbon saturation and mineral stabilization dynamics; (ii) nutrient-acquisition strategies (e.g., plant-microbial symbioses) and the emergence of biogeochemical feedbacks; (iii) physical soil changes that constrain carbon and nutrient turnover. We then highlight papers in this Special Issue on fire and plant-soil interactions that address these three processes to unpack how fire changes biogeochemical cycling in an ecosystem. Conclusion: We conclude that while shifts in plant biomass composition and inputs consistently influence soil properties across studies, increasing evidence shows the critical role of plant-soil interactions in determining belowground processes.

Indexed as

Fire and biogeochemistryFire feedbacksMicrobial-plant interactionsPlant-soil interactionsSoil organic matter

Identifiers

PMID41523316
PMCPMC12789113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.