ArticleJournal of orthodontic science2025
Assessment of the effects following different mandibular incisors intrusive mechanics for treatment of orthodontic patients with deep bite; A randomized clinical trial.
Article in Journal of orthodontic science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveAssessment of total root volume, root length, labial bone height, and amount of intrusion for three different intrusive mechanics; orthodontic miniscrews, utility arch, and the nitinol reverse curve archwire (RCA). PATIENTS AND
methodsTwenty-one deep bite orthodontic patients (male and female, age range 12-16 years old), were involved in the current study. According to the method of intrusion for lower incisors, the patients were randomly subdivided into three groups; Group (A): patients received an intrusive force delivered by elastics from two mini-screws between mandibular lateral incisor and mandibular canine. Group (B): patients received an intrusive force delivered by intrusive utility arch. Group (C): patients received an intrusive force delivered by RCA. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was taken just before and after completion of intrusion of the lower anterior segment. Statistical analysis was done with Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 18; Bonferroni's
resultsA statistically significant difference in root length reduction was found among the three groups.
conclusionsThe nitinol RCA produce adverse effects as a root resorption and reduction of labial bone height during intrusion of the lower anterior segment more than that produced by the orthodontic miniscrews with elastics and utility arch as intrusive mechanics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.