ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
Data-driven head model individualization from digitized electrode positions or photogrammetry improves M/EEG source localization accuracy.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We propose a data-driven algorithm to approximate individual head anatomies to improve source localization accuracy over the widely used standard head models Colin27 and ICBM-152 when structural MRI/CT scans are not available. Based on a low-dimensional representation of a large head model database, we derive individual head shape parameters solely from additional knowledge of the subject's scalp, which is obtained, for example, from photogrammetry scans or precise electrode positions. We demonstrate in an experimental study of 16 subjects that our approach provides better-approximated head model anatomies than other existing approaches, even when using scalp proxies derived from a smartphone scan. Moreover, in an EEG simulation study involving 22 heads, we show that our head models outperform standard and other individualization approaches in terms of source localization accuracy. As our proposed head model individualization method does not require structural scans of each subject, it can help improve source localization with minimal effort in future M/EEG studies, particularly when MRI/CT scans are not available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.