ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
Parametrizing alternating current stimulation for neuromodulation.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The clinical use of alternating current stimulation (ACS) has been confounded by heterogeneity in patient responses. Optimization of this treatment requires understanding the dependence of neuronal responses on ACS parameters. We sought to characterize neuronal responses across varying ACS frequencies and amplitudes and assess the extent to which changes in neuronal activity persist beyond the cessation of the stimulation, thereby informing ACS optimization pathways and evaluating the potential for sustained neuromodulation. We delivered subcutaneous ACS while recording intracortical electrophysiological activity in adult rats. We applied ACS for 1 or 20 minutes and analyzed ensuing spiking activity, power spectra, and low-frequency to high-frequency phase-amplitude coupling (LF-HF PAC). Both durations of ACS elicited a modulation of firing patterns (either in rate or entrainment) in most neurons, in a stimulation frequency- and amplitude-dependent manner. Changes in firing rate were more frequent, albeit modest, whereas changes in entrainment were rarer, but pronounced. Increasing ACS amplitude or frequency increased the degree of entrainment. Further, entrainment changes persisted beyond the 20-minute ACS, at half their online level. Neuronal power and LF-HF PAC increased proximal to excited, but decreased near suppressed neurons. Neuronal entrainment was observed alongside decreased power and LF-HF PAC. The prominent entrainment response to prolonged high-frequency ACS observed here supports the potential of ACS for facilitating signal integration and promoting functional reorganization via spike timing-dependent plasticity. In turn, we found broader temporal windows of excitation under low ACS frequencies engendered greater variability in spike timing, which may be utilized to reduce hypersynchronous or task-irrelevant activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.