Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41523212›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

Extracting reproducible components from electroencephalographic responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation with group task-related component analysis.

Bruno Andry Nascimento Couto, Matteo Fecchio, Simone Russo, Enrico De Martino, Sara Parmigiani, Simone Sarasso, Thomas Graven-Nielsen, Daniel Ciampi de Andrade, Marcello Massimini, Mario Rosanova and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Clinical utility and prospective of TMS-EEG: Updated review from an international expert group.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bruno Andry Nascimento CoutoInstitute of Science and Technology, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil.
Matteo FecchioCenter for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Simone RussoDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Enrico De MartinoCenter for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Sara ParmigianiCenter for Translational Neuroscience (CTN), Department of Human Physiology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States.
Simone SarassoDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Thomas Graven-NielsenCenter for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Daniel Ciampi de AndradeCenter for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Marcello MassiminiDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Mario RosanovaDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Adenauer Girardi CasaliInstitute of Science and Technology, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7024-9029

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) is a powerful technique for investigating human cortical circuits. However, characterizing TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) at the group level typically relies on grand averaging across stimulus repetitions (trials) and subjects-an approach that assumes a level of spatial and temporal consistency that is often lacking in TEPs. Here, we introduce an adaptation of Group Task-Related Component Analysis (gTRCA), a novel multivariate signal decomposition method, to automatically extract TEP components that are maximally reproducible across both trials and subjects. Following the validation of a new permutation-based statistical test for gTRCA using simulated data, the method was applied to two independent TMS-EEG datasets, in which stimulation was targeted to the primary motor cortex (M1) in cohorts of 16 and 22 healthy participants. We found that gTRCA reliably identified TEP components that were reproducible at the group level. Notably, the main gTRCA component captured the key spatial, temporal, and spectral features of motor TEPs, remained robust despite reduced number of stimuli and participants, and was consistent across different recordings. These findings demonstrate that gTRCA affords a more reliable characterization of TEPs at the group level, thereby facilitating the translation of TMS-EEG research into clinical practice.

Indexed as

dimensionality reductionEEGevoked potentialsgroup-level analysisgTRCATMS

Identifiers

PMID41523212
PMCPMC12784221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.