ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
Neural correlates of kinematic features of passive finger movement revealed by univariate and multivariate fMRI analyses.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Finger movements are associated with a relatively large neural representation. Passive finger movement-externally generated movement without voluntary muscle activity-is a robust approach to investigate the neural representation of kinesthesia and proprioception. While some studies have characterized the neural correlates of passive finger movement, they have relied solely on mass univariate analysis, potentially limiting sensitivity. Additionally, limited consideration has been given to stimulus duration, a factor closely tied to kinematic features such as amplitude and velocity, which more recent modeling approaches account for explicitly. Here, we reanalyzed previously published data using both univariate and multivariate analyses to examine how kinesthesia is represented in the brain in neurotypical subjects across two experiments. Systematic passive stimulation of the fingers was provided using an MR-compatible robot while functional magnetic resonance imaging data were recorded. Our analyses were conducted separately for amplitude, velocity, and direction and adjusted for stimulus duration, thereby controlling for this factor whether or not neural activation scaled with it. We provide a detailed mapping of brain areas related to these kinematic features, including sensorimotor, subcortical, and cerebellar regions. In general, multivariate pattern analysis was more sensitive than the univariate approach in identifying brain regions associated with passive finger movement. Our univariate results showed that activity in sensorimotor and subcortical areas was higher for larger amplitudes and slower velocities, which contrasted with the original study's findings, likely due to our treatment of stimulus duration as a parametric modulator. A novel result was that sensorimotor areas showed higher activation for extension compared to flexion of passive finger movement. Across kinematic features, a larger neural representation was observed for amplitude and direction than for velocity, suggesting that kinesthesia and proprioception may rely more strongly on displacement than on movement. Whereas univariate analyses are limited in addressing heterogeneity across voxels, our multivariate analyses revealed that a broader set of brain regions carried condition-related information about passive movement, based on distributed voxel activity patterns. Together, these findings extend current knowledge on how the brain represents physical kinematic features of finger movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.