ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
Multiple brain activation patterns underlying successful visual short-term memory across the adult lifespan.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive task performance can be supported through multiple brain activation patterns, a concept referred to as brain degeneracy. We used a novel approach to consider brain degeneracy during a visual short-term memory task (VSTM) across the adult lifespan in the cross-sectional Cam-CAN study (n = 113, 23-87 years old). Our main goal was to identify subgroups of participants whose VSTM performance was characterized by distinct brain activation patterns. First, we identified seven brain modules that responded similarly to the VSTM task across participants, and resembled previously identified functional networks. Subsequently, latent profile analysis revealed four distinct subgroups of participants. Each subgroup was characterized by different recruitment patterns of these modules, predominantly in the frontal control module (FCM), visual module, dorsal attention module, and default mode module. Subgroups did not differ in demographics or task performance. However, associations between brain activity and performance varied across subgroups, particularly in the FCM, suggesting that individuals may use different cognitive operations to perform the VSTM task. Further analyses revealed group differences in white matter integrity, mostly in the uncinate fasciculus, suggesting that individual differences in structural brain properties may shape the different brain activation patterns. Altogether, our study contributes to our understanding of how multiple brain activation patterns could underlie cognitive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.