ArticleJournal of current glaucoma practice
Impact of Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Spikes on Outcomes Following Goniotomy: A Comparative Study of Surgical Techniques.
Article in Journal of current glaucoma practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ab interno trabeculotomy with vs. without cataract surgery for POAG: a retrospective study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim and background: To compare postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) spikes and 1-year surgical success among goniotomy procedures: Kahook Dual Blade (KDB), OMNI, bent Materials and methods: This single-center, retrospective chart review included glaucoma patients ≥18 years, who underwent goniotomy from January 2021 to December 2022 with ≥3 months of follow-up. Primary outcomes were IOP spikes (≥10 mm Hg increase within 3 months) and 12-month surgical success (≥20% IOP and/or ≥1 medication reduction without further surgery). Secondary outcomes included IOP and medication changes. Results: Among 247 eyes (107 KDB, 63 OMNI, 77 BANG; all with phacoemulsification), IOP spikes occurred in 13.0% with no difference between groups ( Conclusion: Kahook Dual Blade, OMNI, and BANG with phacoemulsification had comparable 1-year safety and efficacy. IOP spikes increase the risk of failure and reoperation, especially in severe glaucoma. GATT showed favorable outcomes when performed standalone. Clinical significance: Choice among KDB, OMNI, and BANG can be individualized without compromising outcomes. Monitoring for IOP spikes is crucial in high-risk eyes. Standalone GATT offers strong results when cataract surgery is not needed. How to cite this article: Shalaby WS, Chang SL, Yu J,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.