ArticleWellcome open research2025
The Brief Prakriti Inventory: Latent structure, reliability, and validity.
Article in Wellcome open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decoding of Human Behaviour and Personality.Annals of neurosciences · 2026Article
- The Brief Prakriti Inventory: Latent structure, reliability, and validity.Wellcome open research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Ayurveda, the traditional Indian medicine system, conceptualizes individual personality (Prakriti) through three dimensions, Vata, Pitta, and Kapha, based on physical, physiological, and psychological traits. Existing tools for Prakriti assessment often lack robust psychometric validation and accessibility. We developed and validated the Brief-Prakriti Inventory (BPI), a 21-item self-report instrument for assessing traditional Indian personality concepts. Methods: An initial 30-item pool was derived from classical Ayurvedic texts and contemporary literature, covering three domains. Following pilot testing and psychometric screening, 21 items were retained. Items used nominal response formats, each mapped to a dosha, with randomized option order via REDCap. Psychometric evaluation employed Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA), Latent Class Analysis (LCA), and Item Response Theory (IRT) in a community sample (N = 1857). Validity was assessed via test-retest reliability, convergent validity with traditional AYUsoft assessments, and divergent validity using Western personality traits (Mini-IPIP). Results: MCA revealed distinct dosha-aligned item clustering, particularly among participants with dominant dosha profiles ( Figure 1). LCA supported a three-class model (dominant-only: entropy R2 = 0.96) ( Figure 2, Supplementary Figure 1). IRT analyses showed strong fit (CFI = 0.967, RMSEA = 0.023) and good reliability (Vata = 0.87, Pitta = 0.75, Kapha = 0.87) ( Figure 3). Psychological items showed highest discrimination; physiological items displayed higher difficulty thresholds. Test-retest reliability was high (ICCs 0.83-0.90). BPI subscales correlated strongly with traditional assessments (r = 0.78-0.84) (Supplementary Figure 2) but minimally with Western personality traits ( Figure 4), supporting construct distinctiveness. Conclusions: The BPI is a brief, reliable, psychometrically validated self-report tool that captures latent dosha typology consistent with Ayurvedic theory. By grouping individuals into Prakriti-based clusters, the BPI will enable biological phenotyping of dosha-linked variability and support personalized, culturally contextualized interventions in integrative and mental health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.