ReviewImmune network2025
Cytokine Engineering in CAR-T Cell Therapy: Next-Generation Strategies.
Review in Immune network, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Vivo mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle CAR-T Cell Engineering: Advances, Challenges, and Clinical Translation.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- CAR-T cell therapy in cancer immunotherapy - Biology, clinical successes, and emerging challenges: A review.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2026Review
- Optimizing next-generation CAR-macrophages against solid tumors: challenges and potential strategies.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Balancing Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors in CD8Immune network · 2026Review
- The regulatory role of IL-37 and IL-38 in CAR-T associated cytokine release syndrome in multiple myeloma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric Ag receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has demonstrated success primarily in B-cell malignancies, but efficacy in solid tumors remains limited by Ag heterogeneity, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironments, and restricted infiltration. Cytokine engineering has emerged as a promising strategy to overcome these barriers. Fourth-generation CAR-T cells, known as T cells redirected for universal cytokine-mediated killing, demonstrated the feasibility of localized immune modulation through activation-induced IL-12 release, and this concept has been extended to various cytokines. Receptor engineering strategies, including switch/inverted and orthogonal designs, restrict cytokine signaling to CAR-T cells, thereby enhancing both specificity and safety. Beyond CAR-T engineering, external cell-based 'cytokine factories' and immune-cytokines further underscore the versatility of localized cytokine delivery strategies. In addition, fifth-generation CAR-T cells, incorporating approaches that enhance or mimic cytokine-mediated JAK-STAT signaling pathways, highlight a new direction toward programmable intracellular signaling. These strategies remain in the early stages of clinical application due to substantial limitations related to safety and clinical translation, including risks of uncontrolled cytokine activation and complexities in manufacturing. Nevertheless, they offer significant potential to improve therapeutic outcomes not only in hematologic malignancies but also across a broad range of solid tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.