ReviewTaiwan journal of ophthalmology
Targeted therapies for meibomian gland dysfunction - The role of antibiotics in meibomian gland dysfunction management.
Review in Taiwan journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immune inflammatory targets and anti-inflammatory therapy in dry eye disease.International ophthalmology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is a leading cause of evaporative dry eye, significantly impairing the quality of life. Bacterial proliferation and inflammation play central roles in the pathogenesis of MGD, creating a vicious cycle of gland obstruction and ocular surface instability. Antibiotics, particularly tetracyclines (e.g. doxycycline and minocycline), and macrolides (e.g. azithromycin and erythromycin), are widely used as adjunctive therapy for moderate-to-severe or refractory MGD. This review conducted a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, focusing on original peer-reviewed articles published in English that reported on the efficacy and/or safety of oral or topical antibiotics for MGD or blepharitis. Eligible studies were identified using the specific search terms, screened by title and abstract, and selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Relevant data were extracted and synthesized, with an emphasis on randomized controlled trials and comparative studies. The review indicates that both oral and topical antibiotics improve subjective symptoms, tear film stability, ocular surface staining, meibum quality, and lid margin abnormalities in the short term. Oral azithromycin may be at least as effective as doxycycline, with a shorter treatment course and fewer adverse events, while topical azithromycin offers similar or superior efficacy to systemic regimens with reduced systemic exposure. However, benefits are usually limited to active treatment periods, and optimal dosing and duration remain uncertain. Long-term efficacy, safety, risk of resistance, and effects on the ocular microbiome require further investigation. Antibiotics should be used judiciously as part of a comprehensive, individualized management strategy for MGD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.