ArticleTaiwan journal of ophthalmology
Innovation in neuro-ophthalmology: The validation of smartphone-based self-screening for early detection of disorders.
Article in Taiwan journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Imaging biomarkers in optic neuritis: current tools and future directions.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis diagnosis study evaluated the diagnostic validity of Neuro-ophthalmology Disorder Early Screening (NODES), a telemedicine-based smartphone application that integrates structured anamnesis and simple neuro-ophthalmology examination for early detection of neuro-ophthalmological disorders. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study was conducted at Sardjito Eye Center Neuro-ophthalmology subdivision, assessing the diagnostic validity of the NODES mobile application of 16 neuro-ophthalmology diagnoses compared to confirmative diagnoses of neuro-ophthalmologists. A total of 126 participants meeting inclusion criteria underwent two treatments: simple examination using the NODES application, compared to confirmative examination by neuro-ophthalmologists. Standard protocols were integrated into both treatments to evaluate the diagnosis accuracy of the examination.
resultsNODES showcase promising results as a new diagnostic tool for these four disorders; myasthenia gravis (MG) with the area under the curve (AUC) =0.951, multicranial nerve palsy orbital apex (MNP OA) with AUC = 0.900, monocranial nerve palsy N.III (MNP N.III) with AUC = 0.824, and monocranial sixth nerve palsy (MNP N.VI) with AUC = 0.764.
conclusionThe NODES application can be used as a new diagnostic screening tool for several euro-ophthalmology diagnoses including MG, multicranial nerve palsy orbital apex, monocranial nerve palsy N.III, and monocranial sixth nerve palsy. The high specificity of NODES in other neuro-ophthalmology diagnoses can be quite useful to identify individuals without the condition, reducing the occurrence of false positives and crucial in preventing unnecessary stress, further testing, and potential misdiagnoses for those who do not actually have the condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.