Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41523124›Full record

ReviewTaiwan journal of ophthalmology

Presbyopia intraocular lens in aberrated corneas.

Christopher Tay, Jodhbir S Mehta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Taiwan journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christopher TayYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Jodhbir S MehtaSingapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasingly, patients desire spectacle independence postcataract surgery, for which multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is widely performed. However, multifocal IOLs have certain drawbacks: fixed focal change, increased photic phenomena, and unsuitability for use in aberrated eyes. Monovision is an option, but can only achieve fixed focal points as well. An alternative IOL that bridges the gap between providing an extended depth of focus (DOF) and decreasing induced aberrations is the IC-8 Apthera IOL, which utilizes small aperture technology to provide a continuous DOF with good near, intermediate and distance vision in eyes with up to 1.50D of preoperative astigmatism. Importantly, the IC-8 IOL has shown potential for use in aberrated eyes, demonstrating increased visual acuity at all distances, good contrast sensitivity, minimal photic phenomena, and high levels of spectacle independence in patients with corneal irregularities and higher order aberrations, especially postrefractive surgery. The IC-8 IOL has also been able to achieve good centration and positional stability, which is key for good visual outcomes and spectacle independence after surgery. This paper aims to bring together relevant literature to review the outcomes of IC-8 IOL.

Indexed as

Aberrated corneaastigmatismcataractcentrationextended depth of focus intraocular lensIC-8 intraocular lensintraocular lenspresbyopiasmall aperture intraocular lens

Identifiers

PMID41523124
PMCPMC12782530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.