ArticleJournal of nursing management2026
Nurse Leaders' Perceptions and Practices of E-Leadership: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence literacy and influencing factors among clinical nurses in southeastern China: a latent profile analysis.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Nurse Leaders' Perceptions and Practices of E-Leadership: A Qualitative Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: While research on nursing leadership has grown, empirical studies specifically addressing e-leadership in nursing remain scarce. Digitalization offers opportunities to enhance efficiency and flexibility but also necessitates careful management of interpersonal relationships and staff well-being. E-leadership in nursing requires strong interpersonal competencies, organizational support, targeted training, and clear policies, along with a balanced leadership approach. Notably, there is a lack of research on the state of e-leadership in nursing in the postpandemic context. Aim: This study aims to explore the current state of Finnish nurse leaders' experiences with e-leadership. Methods: A qualitative research design was employed, utilizing individual thematic interviews and inductive content analysis. Fourteen individual interviews were conducted. The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) checklist guided the reporting process. Results: The analysis yielded three main categories: (1) E-leadership in nursing is here to stay, (2) a lack of consistent e-leadership practices in nursing, and (3) e-leadership presents challenges for both nurse leaders and staff. Although e-leadership remains under development and lacks clearly defined structures, both nurse leaders and staff demonstrate a willingness to adopt and implement this leadership model. However, organizational support has been insufficient, often leaving nurse leaders to independently develop solutions to the challenges they face. Conclusion: This study reinforces previous findings on e-leadership in nursing while offering new insights into its current state. E-leadership is a dynamic and evolving practice that requires a delicate balance between digital efficiency and human connection. Despite its challenges, e-leadership presents significant opportunities for the nursing profession, including enhanced flexibility and improved work-life balance. Implications for Nursing Management: The findings can inform the development of practical guidelines for implementing e-leadership in nursing and healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.