Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41523092›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognition2026

Miyake Revisited: Validating the Factor Structure of an Open-Source Cognitive Control Test Battery.

Febe Demeyer, Sarah De Pue, Bart Aben, Kirsten A Verhaegen, Anne-Merel Meijer, Céline R Gillebert, Eva Van den Bussche

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Febe DemeyerBrain & Cognition, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5736-0168
Sarah De PueBrain & Cognition, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2238-2137
Bart AbenBrain & Cognition, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7918-1590
Kirsten A VerhaegenBrain & Cognition, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2287-4377
Anne-Merel MeijerBrain & Cognition, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8921-5929
Céline R GillebertBrain & Cognition, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6686-7262
Eva Van den BusscheBrain & Cognition, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1894-9380

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive control is a prerequisite for achieving goals in daily life. Miyake et al. (2000) distinguished three separable but correlated cognitive control functions in young adults: inhibition, shifting, and updating. This three-factor model was later adapted to a bi-factor model with a common factor and separate updating and shifting factors. Over the years, these models have been replicated in various young adult samples. However, other studies have failed to confirm these models. Furthermore, the variety of tasks used in these studies hampers replication of the underlying factor structure of cognitive control. The primary goal of this study was to address this issue of replicability by validating the factor structure of cognitive control functions using a new test battery based on often-used tasks, while offering full transparency about each step in the analysis process. This test battery comprises nine behavioral tasks measuring inhibition, shifting and updating. The factor structure was assessed in 247 young adults (84.21% female). Confirmatory Factor Analysis was used to test the one-factor model with a common cognitive control function, the three-factor model with separate but correlated cognitive control functions, and the bi-factor model. Our findings supported the three-factor model with correlated cognitive control functions as the best-fitting model, despite some fit indices yielding mixed evidence. Additionally, the test battery in this study is offered as an open-source and easily accessible resource. Finally, we offer a critical look on the field and provide recommendations for future use and adaptations of this test battery to increase its broad applicability.

Indexed as

cognitive controlexecutive controlfactor structure

Identifiers

PMID41523092
PMCPMC12785704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.