Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41523090›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognition2026

Global and Selective Effects of Auditory Attention on Arousal: Insights From Pupil Dilation.

Aurélie Grandjean, Roxane S Hoyer, Anne Mathieu, Anne Caclin, Annie Moulin, Aurélie Bidet-Caulet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aurélie Grandjean *Aix Marseille Univ, Inserm, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France.
Roxane S Hoyer *CERVO Brain Research Centre, Laval University, Québec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0954-8550
Anne MathieuAix Marseille Univ, Inserm, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France.
Anne CaclinUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSERM, CNRS, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon CRNL U1028 UMR5292, F-69500, Bron, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1367-5923
Annie Moulin *Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSERM, CNRS, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon CRNL U1028 UMR5292, F-69500, Bron, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5883-2112
Aurélie Bidet-Caulet *Aix Marseille Univ, Inserm, INS, Inst Neurosci Syst, Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8135-0725

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theoretical models of attention propose that norepinephrine (NE) can induce both a global boost of arousal and selective amplification of high-priority stimuli, yet few tasks have tested these dual effects in humans. Here, we used pupillometry in an auditory detection task, the Competitive Attention Test (CAT), previously performed in large cohort studies, to examine how task engagement (active vs. passive) and stimulus relevance (informative vs. uninformative cues) modulate arousal. Results showed that both relevant and irrelevant sounds elicited larger pupil dilation under active conditions, indicating a global arousal effect. Crucially, only relevant sounds benefited from an additional dilation when preceded by an informative cue, demonstrating a selective arousal mechanism associated to top-down attention. These findings illustrate the NE's dual role in boosting overall alertness while selectively enhancing high-priority stimuli. Beyond theoretical implications, this work highlights that the CAT captures measurable arousal components, reinforcing its utility for clinical assessments of attention-arousal clinical disruptions.

Indexed as

AttentionAuditory perceptionEye movements

Identifiers

PMID41523090
PMCPMC12785711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.