ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Treatment Strategies for Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Transoral Robotic Surgery.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) continue to pose major global health burdens, with conventional treatment modalities frequently associated with considerable morbidity. Emerging strategies such as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for OCSCC and transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for OPSCC have been introduced to enhance personalization of care and preserve functional outcomes. This systematic review summarizes current evidence on the efficacy, safety and functional results of these modalities. Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search of major databases was conducted, and risk of bias was assessed for all eligible studies. The included literature evaluated key oncologic parameters such as overall survival, disease-free survival, recurrence rates and margin status, alongside patient-reported and clinician-reported functional measures including swallowing ability, speech outcomes and quality of life indices such as MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory scores. Safety outcomes such as treatment-related toxicities, complication rates, and requirements for feeding tubes or tracheostomy were also analyzed. The review provides an integrated appraisal of the clinical utility of NACT in OCSCC and TORS in OPSCC, emphasizing their potential to improve oncologic control while minimizing functional impairment, while also addressing the influence of study quality and methodological limitations on the strength of the available evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.